银魂

越来越多女性，确诊PMS_我的网站

一 |     Editor's Note:
August 15 marked the 81st anniversary of Japan's announcement of its unconditional surrender. Eighty-one years on, Japan, the defeated aggressor in World War II (WWII), has not only failed to conduct a thorough reckoning with its wartime aggression, but has instead intensified its drive to expand military power. In its newly released 2026 Defense White Paper on August 4, Japan says that "defense business not only possesses a high degree of public value by directly contributing to the protection of citizens' lives, but also contributes to Japan's economic growth through ripple effects into the civilian sector."
This line of argument, along with Japan's defense policies in recent years, in fact reflects a form of "military Keynesianism" - the use of military spending as a means to stimulate overall economic development. However, this logic of "trying to boost the economy through military buildup" has faced widespread skepticism inside Japan. Some scholars have also warned that Japan pursued a similar policy during WWII, which led to the expansion of the military-industrial complex (MIC) and, in objective terms, fueled the scale of Japan's war of aggression, bringing profound suffering to the peoples of Asia and the world.

    People take part in a protest march in Tokyo, opposing politicians making ritual offerings to or visiting the notorious Yasukuni Shrine, on August 15, 2026. Photo: cnsphoto
Pursuing a military Keynesian path
Japan's 2026 Defense White Paper, at 598 pages, has set a record as the longest in history. More alarming than its length, however, is the document's first-ever explicit definition of the development of the defense industry as an effective means of promoting "economic growth." 
"The white paper 'stresses that investment in defense benefits the wider economy and people's lives,' according to a Defense Ministry presentation document," reported Reuters on August 4. "That message aligns with Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's broader use of strategic state spending in an effort to drive economic growth," Reuters commented. Previously, The Asahi Shimbun warned in an opinion piece that this entanglement of defense buildup with economic policy will, over time, slide into "military Keynesianism."
"Military Keynesianism" refers to the use of military spending as a tool to stimulate overall economic development. Since the Takaichi administration took office, Japan has been expanding its domestic defense market through year-on-year increases in the defense budget, while at the same time opening up international sales channels for defense production by relaxing export controls - thereby systematically pursuing a military Keynesian path.
In fiscal 2026, Japan's defense budget for the first time exceeded 9 trillion yen ($56.5 billion). Its defense-related spending has already reached 2 percent of GDP, according to The Japan Times. This not only means Japan's defense budget has risen for 14 consecutive years, but also indicates that the government is using fiscal stimulus to artificially create a large and relatively stable "arms market." The resulting closed-loop logic is clear: the government increases defense spending to expand procurement; defense companies receive orders and scale up production; and, through industrial-chain spillovers, related industries also expand output.
As Japan's new Defense White Paper says, higher defense expenditures will not only significantly increase orders in the defense industry, but also reinforce the defense production base through measures such as introducing mechanisms to assess corporate efforts and calculate appropriate profits for companies. These measures, the paper claims, are expected to generate economic ripple effects, "as well as technological ripple effects into the civilian sector." 
What is even more alarming is that Japan is systematically removing the institutional barriers to the growth of its defense industry. 
One long-standing challenge in postwar Japan has been the limited size of its domestic defense market and restrictions on arms exports, which have kept defense firms' profits relatively low and prompted some major companies to withdraw from parts of the military supply business, observers pointed out.
In 2022, however, Japan elevated the defense industry to a national strategic priority in its three key security documents, National Security Strategy, National Defense Strategy and Defense Buildup Program. In 2023, it enacted the Act on Enhancing Defense Production and Technology Bases, allowing the government to sustain and reinforce defense manufacturing through subsidies, capital investment and other measures. And in April this year, the Takaichi administration formally lifted the ban on exports of lethal weapons, fully opening the door for Japan's defense industry to enter global markets.
Together, these moves show that Japan is no longer content with relying on its Self-Defense Forces' limited procurement needs. It seeks to turn itself into a global arms supplier. This will inevitably intensify the regional arms race and seriously destabilize the security landscape in East Asia, warned some experts reached by the Global Times.
Of particular concern is that the focus of Japan's military Keynesianism has shifted from traditional weapons such as guns and artillery, to high-tech fields including artificial intelligence (AI) and drones, with an explicit emphasis on civil-military integration. Japan's new Defense White Paper places special emphasis on AI and unmanned systems, which are expected to become central issues in the year-end revision of its three key security documents.
Widespread criticism and concern
Japan's bid to jolt economic growth through higher military spending amounts to little more than a wishful gamble that "guns for butter" can be turned on its head. But when the fiscal question of "where will the money come from?" collides with public anxiety over "where is people's livelihood headed?", voices from international media outlets to Japanese scholars, lawmakers and ordinary citizens alike, are warning that the narrative of arms-led prosperity is not only unlikely to work, but could also drag Japan's economy into dangerous territory, observers noted.
Japan's fiscal expenditure faces "competing demands on the public purse," "but Takaichi has yet to explain clearly how she would pay for a further expansion without adding pressure on Japan's already stretched public finances," Reuters said on August 4.
In a Japanese-language editorial piece on August 8, The Asahi Shimbun pushed the debate further toward livelihoods, saying that military expansion would place a direct strain on the daily lives of Japanese people. The piece also cited a United Nations study saying that reallocating the same resources to education and healthcare rather than the military could generate more jobs. The International Monetary Fund has also warned that rising defense spending may, in the medium term, increase economic vulnerabilities, including through wider fiscal deficits, it said. 
 Opposition within Japan's academic circles runs equally fierce. Yuko Tanaka, a professor emeritus at Hosei University, argues the Takaichi administration's military buildup policies are driving Japan's economy toward collapse. The continuous depreciation of the yen and climbing government bond yields have rendered its "responsible proactive fiscal policies" unsustainable in the eyes of markets. If military expansion takes precedence over people's livelihoods, Japan's economy will fall into prolonged stagnation and recession, culminating in bankruptcy, Tanaka told the Global Times. 
Strong criticism also echoes across Japan's political arena. House of Representatives member Joji Yamamoto accused the Takaichi administration of doubling defense spending and lifting bans on weapons exports, while shifting healthcare costs onto patients and eroding elderly care systems. If left unchecked, Japan will gradually turn into a nation sustained by the arms trade, seriously violating people's right to subsistence guaranteed by law, Yamamoto told the Global Times. 
A risky gamble

Military Keynesianism is not only unlikely to sustain long-term economic growth in Japan, but also carries hidden security risks. Koji Sonoda, deputy editor at The Asahi Shimbun's Political News Section, recently cautioned that if defense budget expansion, initially justified by a deteriorating security environment, comes instead to serve the goal of economic growth through industrial promotion, the risk grows that spending will lose any effective restraint. 
History has already proven this point. The global economic depression of 1929 triggered the Showa Depression in Japan, pushing the country's economy to the brink of collapse. At the time, rather than pursuing structural reforms, Japan's political and military leadership shifted the national economy onto a wartime footing, using military spending to boost demand and mask unemployment.
Meng Mingming, assistant researcher at the Institute of Japanese Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times that in 1932, Korekiyo Takahashi, Japan's then Finance Minister, rolled out stimulus policies including yen depreciation and expanded fiscal outlays. Massive military spending paired with public works projects lifted domestic demand and enabled Japan to recover from the recession earlier than many nations. Takahashi became known as "Japan's Keynes."
However, the prosperity driven by fiscal deficits and military-industrial expansion was ultimately a shortsighted fix. Meng pointed out that, first, while wartime demand boosted Japan's heavy chemical and weapons manufacturing sectors to some extent, most military output was removed from the social reproduction cycle and constituted sheer waste. Second, heavy chemical industries relied heavily on resources such as oil, which Japan lacked domestically. This created a vicious cycle: military demand expanded heavy industrial capacity; that expansion increased Japan's dependence on overseas resources and markets; rising resource needs drove further military expansion to secure supply chains; and that expansion in turn required even more defense spending, further militarizing the economy. Finally, a coalition of interest formed among heavy industrial capitalists, emerging zaibatsu and the military. Military adventurism was no longer driven solely by the armed forces, but was backed by industrial and financial power.
    People hold placards reading "No war" and "Stop constitutional revision, military expansion" during the Grand Constitution Rally 2026 to mark Constitution Memorial Day in Tokyo on May 3, 2026. Photo: vcgOnce the narrative that "military demand brings prosperity" gained mainstream acceptance, cutting military spending became a political taboo. Takahashi later sought to rein in military budgets and was assassinated in the February 26 Incident of 1936. His successor as finance minister, Eiichi Baba, treated military expansion as a long-term necessity. After the Lugou Bridge Incident in 1937, Japan enacted the National Mobilization Law in 1938, ushering in a full wartime system. "History shows the defense industry is never a silver bullet for economic prosperity," Meng said. Growth driven by arms expansion only leads to economic distortion, depletion of national strength and eventual self-destruction, he said. 
Currently, many Japanese citizens have recognized the dangers of the Takaichi administration's policies and taken to the streets to protest. 
Kazuo Adachi, a sexagenarian, told the Global Times in Japan that behind the administration's claim that the defense industry fuels growth lies the profit motive of the military-industrial complex. From policy deregulation launched under the Abe administration to accelerated implementation under the Takaichi administration, the path of military expansion catering to arms capital is akin to poison, fraught with alarming risks.
Marin Toyosu, a member of Japan's Generation Z, said the Takaichi administration's aggressive push for war preparedness essentially hides a self-serving agenda under the slogan of a "virtuous cycle between security and the economy." It abandons vulnerable groups to benefit a small circle of arms capitalists and represents an administration bent on stoking conflict. 
"This military expansion agenda harms Japanese citizens and endangers people across the world," she noted.
Tatara Satoshi, an anti-war activist, pointed out that the Takaichi administration hypes up the "China threat" to justify military buildup while pushing the flawed argument that the defense industry can boost the economy. 
This does not reflect the genuine aspirations of Japanese society or ordinary citizens. "Japanese people do not want war with China. They should unite to firmly oppose efforts to advance military expansion by stoking tensions and overstating supposed economic benefits," he said.
Global Times
。    在月经来潮前，你是否曾有过这样的感受？                    心情莫名低落，不想说话也不想工作。与此同时，身体发出信号：心悸、失眠、多梦、暴饮暴食、爆痘、记忆力下降……那几天，你常常觉得“世界和我只能活一个”。

二 |                    许多人对此已经习以为常。“每个月都有那几天啦”“她就是情绪不好，过几天就好了”。这些轻描淡写的话语掩盖了一个事实：不适的感受并非“作”或“矫情”，而是一种真实的疾病。                   长期以来，这种疾病在公共视野中近乎隐形。直到今年4月，日本电影《黎明的一切》在国内上映，才第一次将镜头对准经前期综合征患者。许多观众在看完后纷纷感叹：“这些症状我也有，原来我不是情绪不稳定，而是生病了。”                    图源：电影《黎明的一切》                    每月一次的身心风暴，可能正是经前期综合征（Premenstrual Syndrome， 简称PMS）在悄然发生。                   月经来潮前，身心的双重崩溃                    女性的月经痛苦，其实在来潮前就已经开始。                   医学研究表明，早在月经来潮前的1～2周，一系列生理、心理及行为症状便可能接踵而至：情绪低落、失眠、食欲变化、疲乏无力……                    从月经周期图来看，在一个平均28天的周期中，女性真正不受干扰、可以正常生活的时间只有约一周。其余的日子，我们要么在忍受痛经，要么在与PMS对抗。                   月经周期图，图源：Cleveland Clinic                    不仅持续时间漫长，受经前期综合征影响的人群也远比我们想象得更为广泛。                   据今年8月修订的《默沙东诊疗手册》统计：美国约有13%～18%的育龄女性患有PMS；全球范围内，约80%的女性一生中至少经历过一种PMS症状，其中真正能确诊的比例约18%。                   换句话说，每5名女性中，就有1人可能被确诊为PMS患者。                   经期前后情绪波动的感受，《摩登家庭》剧照                    在医学领域，PMS的类型和严重程度因人而异，且每个月经周期都有所不同。常见症状包括易怒、焦虑、激动、愤怒、失眠、注意力不集中、嗜睡、抑郁和严重疲劳；此外，还可能出现腹胀、手脚浮肿、乳房胀痛以及体重暂时增加等身体变化。                   如果将所有可能出现的症状逐一列出，可以清楚地看到——PMS对女性造成的身体与心理影响多达数十种。

三 |                              图源：《默沙东诊疗手册（大众版）》“PMS可能出现的症状”                    现实中，越来越多女性开始意识到“不适感”的来源。在某社交平台上，与经前期综合征相关的话题浏览量已超过1700万，热门帖子点赞数过万。                   其中，大量女性分享了自己经前期出现的身体与情绪变化。

四 |                    睡眠问题是最常见的信号。当一名女性突然嗜睡、失眠、早醒、多梦，往往意味着经前期综合征正在悄然发作。

五 |                    网友们讨论PMS对睡眠的影响，图源：ID“Yukiki”                    食欲的异常也是典型表现之一：有人暴饮暴食难以克制，有人则对食物失去兴趣，几乎吃不下饭。

六 |                    只出现单一症状的PMS患者，已经算是“幸运儿”。

七 | 多数患者同时经历多种症状的爆发，身心俱疲，找不到一处舒服的位置。                   不少女性在PMS期间还出现明显的抑郁、焦虑或情绪失控，心理上的困扰远甚于身体不适。如果此时恰逢高压时期或突发事件，情绪便会瞬间崩溃，难以找到出口。

八 | 于是，许多人困惑：自己究竟是患上抑郁、焦虑，还是陷入了又一次PMS。

九 |                    28岁的网友@四岛由 在社交平台上分享自己的PMS经历。她形容，PMS叠加在痛经之上，“就像在生理苦役上，又加了一道精神苦役。”                    现在，她每个月不仅要忍受痛经，在来潮前还要应对极端的情绪低落、莫名的烦躁、偶发性心悸，以及饮食和睡眠的紊乱。                   图源：ID“四岛由”的豆瓣日记“一次令我崩溃的月经”                    正是因为这些真实而剧烈的痛苦，医学界开始重新审视经前期综合征的严重性。                   PMS并非轻微不适，往往严重且具破坏性，可能干扰女性的工作、社交活动或人际关系，影响日常生活的方方面面。                   在医学判断中，有一个关键标准：这些症状若在月经来潮前规律性出现，并在月经开始或结束后不久随之缓解或消失，便很可能属于PMS的范畴。                   值得注意的是，PMS的多数症状虽然扰乱了女性的生活秩序，却并不危及生命。但对于一小部分长年受PMS折磨的女性，病症可能不断加深，对日常活动失去兴趣，情绪陷入极端低谷，甚至产生自我伤害的念头。                   此时，她们已从PMS进入更严重的阶段——经前烦躁障碍（Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder，简称PMDD）。                   从PMS到PMDD，这些女性经历的已不再是“情绪大跳水”，而是彻底的情绪坍塌。她们难以正常工作和生活，已进入精神疾病的诊疗范畴。                   据英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）官网数据显示，在所有PMS患者中，约有3%～8%符合PMDD的诊断标准。                   PMS与PMDD的区别，图片源于网络                    对于这部分女性而言，每个月的月经周期犹如一场准时到来的审判。

十 | 她们要与身体的剧痛、情绪的坍塌，以及反复袭来的自我伤害念头持续抗争。                   “我成了自己的囚犯。”这句话用在她们身上再贴切不过。                   PMS，一种长期被忽视的疾病                    与PMS可能导致的身心全面崩溃相比，这种疾病长期被忽视的现实，显得格外讽刺。

十一 |                    时至今日，在经前期综合征（PMS）的医学研究领域，仍普遍存在“四无”现象：                    没有明确、客观的临床诊断标准；          缺少足够数量可供研究的病例；          缺少专门的门诊科室；          也没有针对性的治疗药物。

十二 |                    这意味着，占据人类一半数量的女性，在漫长的月经周期与PMS折磨中，面临一个残酷的事实：社会仍未真正承认，它是一种疾病。                   在关于月经的认知中，仍存在着显著的空白。其中最重要的原因，便是女性生理痛苦长期被忽视。                   英国作家卡罗琳·克利亚多·佩雷斯在《看不见的女性》中写道：“半夜会被疼痛惊醒，白天又蜷成一团直哼哼。当我去找医生求诊时，他多少带着点取笑的语气，结果我只能退出去。”                    类似的情形在全球范围内惊人地相似。即便是更为人所知的痛经和绝经，也常被轻描淡写地对待——“忍一忍就好了”“多喝点热水”。                   而更隐蔽的经前期综合征，甚至被许多人误解为“作”或“矫情”，导致女性一次次选择沉默。集体的沉默使得PMS在医学领域长期缺乏明确的研究病例。                   造成PMS研究长期停滞的另一个原因，是其症状难以明确归因。                   在前文提到的PMS症状中，身体类不适往往能对应到具体科室，“头痛医头，脚痛医脚”。

十三 | 由于不适部位明确，医生和患者容易忽略背后的深层原因，过于集中在消除症状上。结果通常是，症状暂时缓解，下个月再次复发。                   而心理层面的症状则更加复杂，常常与精神类疾病交织，即使是专业医生，也难以准确判断病因究竟是来自PMS还是其他精神障碍。                   图源《生理大叔和他的女儿》剧照                    正因如此，PMS的诊断变得异常困难。

十四 | 女性难以找到合适的就诊科室，许多人只能“病急乱投医”。                   不少人在就诊的第一步就陷入困惑：“我该挂哪一科？妇科还是精神科？”                    精神障碍与PMS的区分有一个相对通用的判断标准：PMS的确诊需要症状持续至少两个月经周期，且必须至少满足五项常见症状。                   图源：《默沙东诊疗手册（大众版）：经前综合症》                    如果符合以上标准，患者可以寻求妇科内分泌科的帮助，若症状严重，则可进一步转向精神科。

十五 |                    尽管这些标准看似清晰，但在实际操作中仍存在诸多困难。最基本的问题是：如何判断症状是否“足够严重，以至于干扰日常活动”？                    由于病症难以归因，且判断标准具有一定弹性和主观性，这也解释了为何PMS长期处于医学研究的边缘地带。                   然而，除了PMS诊疗上的难题，国际医学研究领域对女性健康问题的长期滞后，具有更深远的影响。                   在《看不见的女性》一书中，作者提到：“男性勃起障碍的研究是PMS研究的五倍……目前可用于PMS的药物极为稀缺，现有治疗方案对超过40%的PMS患者无效。”                    图源网络                    大量医学研究早已证明，女性的每个器官和系统，在生理学上与男性有着显著不同，因此女性应当获得量身定制的诊断、治疗和预防保障。但现实是，许多女性疾病依然未能得到足够重视。                   制药企业往往“无利不起早”，面对高投入、低回报的PMS研究，它们更愿意将资金投入回报更快、适用范围更广的男性健康领域或疫苗研究中。甚至有研究者在申请PMS相关拨款时，曾因“PMS实际上并不存在”的理由被拒绝。                   时至今日，打开英国国家医疗服务体系官网，PMS的“疾病成因”一栏仍显示为“未完全明确”。页面仅提到，月经周期中雌激素和孕激素水平的急剧波动是广泛认同的可能原因。

十六 |                    图源：NHS官网“PMS的成因”                    PMS早在1992年就被世界卫生组织纳入《国际疾病分类》第十版（ICD-10），然而直到2011年，国际经前期障碍学会才发布了“PMS临床诊断与量化标识”。

十七 | 两年后，美国精神病学会将PMDD纳入《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》，并且国际疾病分类ICD-11也同步收录该正式疾病，进一步明确了分类和诊断标准。

十八 |                    终于，PMS作为一种明确的女性疾病得以“被看见”，与之相关的临床医学研究也随之开展。

十九 |                    接纳胜过抵抗，让她们不再孤独                    今年7月，一篇发表于《Nature》子刊的医学研究，通过分析近10万名女性的数据，揭示出“经前烦躁障碍是女性心血管疾病的隐形预警信号”，为后续研究和药物研发提供了新的视角。

|                    图源Nature子刊“Nature Cardiovascular Research”                    尽管有了新发现，经前期综合征的研究前景，却并非如我们所期待的那般乐观。                   承认PMS作为一种正式疾病，仅仅是第一步。如何进一步细分病症、进行诊疗、并推动药物研发，才是经前期综合征研究面临的真正挑战。                   正如《性别攸关：男性中心的医疗体系如何伤害女性健康》一书所言： “‘经前期综合征’就像是一个收纳了许多病因不明症状的废纸篓。”即使一些认知较高的患者意识到自己需要医疗帮助，但PMS的症状跨越妇科、内分泌科、精神科等多个领域，这种模糊性使她们很难找到合适的医生。                   一篇来自哈佛医学院的研究文章《不要相信经期的大脑》反映了这一令人失望的现状。该文章在科普知识的同时，仅笼统介绍了几种“有助于缓解心情”的做法，既没有针对PMS的具体方案，也未提供明确的治疗效果。

|                              目前，医生对PMS患者的建议主要集中在改善生活方式上，如保持良好睡眠、规律锻炼和健康饮食”。有时，医生会推荐激素类药物、抗抑郁药，或是含有维生素B6和柠檬酸镁的膳食补剂。这些方法的效果并不确定，甚至可能无效。                   对此，许多女性表达了不满：“为什么有明显的不适症状，治疗手段却如此儿戏？”                              她们认为，“多出门、多晒太阳、适当做拉伸运动”等万金油式建议，充满了侥幸心理和随机效果，无法满足PMS患者的真实需求。只有更专业、精确、有效的药物或治疗方法，才能解决问题。                   当前的治疗方案还常常忽视潜在的健康风险。比如，使用膳食补剂时，若剂量不当，效果可能适得其反。

|                    图源：《默沙东治疗手册》                    在电影《黎明的一天》中，女主角尝试口服避孕药与中医疗法。

| 虽然避孕药有时能缓解症状，但在开始使用后的最初6周，症状可能会加重。至于中医疗法，用它来治疗PMS更像是一场健康赌博。                   在医院提供的帮助有限的情况下，网友们在社交平台上分享自己的PMS经历，提供了一些自救的方法。                   面对可能的PMS病症，我们首先能做的，是接纳并诚实记录身体状况。

| 将PMS视为换季感冒一样正常的生理现象，详细记录至少两个周期的每日健康数据，包括睡眠、饮食、情绪、社交等细节。

| 通过这些记录，可以与PMS/PMDD的通用诊疗标准进行对照，为日后求医提供有力依据。                   PMS从来不是一个私人的、羞耻的话题，任何潜在的患者都可以坦然谈论自己的病症。

| 这不仅为医生提供了诊疗依据，也为他人提供了宝贵的参考。                   一些网友在分享自己的PMS经历后，发现原来有这么多人正在经历相似的困扰。“我发现了这个病，立刻安排去看医生。但也有一些人，却未曾意识到自己生病了。

| ”                    “希望更多女性能正视由月经引发的精神疾病，大家一起分享经验，积极治疗，形成更广阔的月经诊疗空间。”                    2024年，英国成立了首个专注经前烦躁障碍的慈善机构——“The PMDD Project”，通过组建社区、艺术疗愈以及开发指南和工具包，减少围绕PMS以及PMDD的污名与误解，切实改善患者的生活质量。                   英国The PMDD Project慈善机构官网                    在国内，也有类似的经前期综合征互助平台。比如，在豆瓣话题“你所经历过PMS带来的影响”下，许多女性分享个人经验，相互鼓励与支持，形成了一个充满温暖与力量的社群。                   有陪伴的诊疗过程，本身就是一种情绪疗愈。在面对经前期的生理与心理波动时，接纳往往比抵抗更为重要。正如电影《黎明的一天》中的女主角所说：“现在的我通过瑜伽和脊椎按摩，身体更灵活了。”                    你瞧，PMS也并非全无益处。放松心态，勇敢自救，“黎明前的黑暗无需畏惧，因为在温暖的黄昏里，总有同伴会稳稳地接住你。”                    参考文献：          1、简单心理《80%以上的女性都曾受困于这种痛苦：它不是你的错》          2、Wellness好《不被科研看见的女性「经前焦虑症」》          3、她刊《确诊PMDD的女生，越来越多了》          4、南风窗《来月经前，情绪失控，不是她的错》          5、一颗青杏《月经来前一周，我经历了极度痛苦情绪、食欲衰退、失眠与噩梦》          6、柳叶刀客《确诊PMS的女生，越来越多了》          7、默沙东诊疗手册（大众版）《经前综合症（PMS）》默沙东诊疗手册（大众版）          8、NHS：https://111.wales.nhs.uk/                    本文来自微信公众号：十点人物志，作者：参宿叁，编辑：芝士咸鱼、野格。

|

Current article:http://9dtt2dx.feizengbubaipeirangnalouchuo.sbs/list_r3f/599i.html

Published on:16:25:20